![]() |
Re: What do you prefer???
Quote:
Morph, here's another example, Timesplitters 2 vs Halo... Timesplitters being the tandard sequal thar lacks any type of innovation... and Halo being the innovative game that was rushed out to the Market. There are planty of examples but only a few pop to mind... I guess you could use True Crimes vs GTA:VC... it's too obvious for me to explain which falls into which category ;) |
Re: What do you prefer???
Quote:
+Rep |
Re: What do you prefer???
Here's how I see it.
Innovative but unpolished = casual fans (mainly ps2) Standard but polished = hardcore gamers (mainly nintendo) :p |
Re: What do you prefer???
Quote:
|
Re: What do you prefer???
Quote:
|
Re: What do you prefer???
I also agree with that.
But I would still take the perfect game over the non perfect innovative game, even though I consider myself a "hardcore" gamer. Put between these two options: 1) Innovative Perfect 2) Standard Perfect I would MOST DEFFINATLY go for the Innovative game. |
Re: What do you prefer???
Most change Agent games aren't perfect though... and it's standard sequal almost allways proves that ;)
Think of it like this... imagine your dream game and think about your favorite game (that isn't original, like your favorite sequal to somthing)... would you rather have your dream game but not realized 100% due to financial constraints or a sequal to your favorite game? |
Re: What do you prefer???
Yes, I think MM is more innovative than TWW. Though, I didnt like the time limit.
|
Re: What do you prefer???
Quote:
|
Re: What do you prefer???
Quote:
Everybody wants quality games... the arguement in question is new innovative content that isn't polished vs a standard sequal that is polished. Quality has nothing to do with it, imagine that both games got an equal score from most review places... but one is innovative incomplete and has a few bugs, but the things it does have allows it to have the same score as the standard sequal. We are talking Halo vs Smash Brothers Melee here... not some crappy innovative game vs a great polished game... two games, equal scores, but one not living up to it's potential, and the other living up to it's full potental.... |
Re: What do you prefer???
Right said fred.
|
Re: What do you prefer???
Quote:
|
Re: What do you prefer???
Quote:
|
Re: What do you prefer???
[quote=Nitram]Well I guess it depends on how you see it. For me a game that is not polished that has bugs and a not so good game play....QUOTE]
Who said the game has to have bad gameplay? Plud I'd take GTA over Zelda:WW or MP anyday.... guess that makes me a casual gamer ;) |
Re: What do you prefer???
This is a bit of a funny one really for the most part I like to play games that add some thing new to the whole world of game's. Lets face it Doom was one of the best games of it's time but I would hate to think what life would be like if people only made FPS to the model of DOOM I and 2. but at the same time I fond it real fun many years after doom to S SAM I and II.
I think what I'm trying to say is all DEV should look at doing more innovative games then most do at this time but it's not the end of the world if some games play like the last one as long as DEV's don't take it too far (No names.........EA). |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern