![]() |
Re: Colbert is Rude
Quote:
And if you don't want to be "lumped in" with Dyflon, then don't jump right in as soon as Dyflon in taken to task. You lumped yourself in to this. Overall my issue is not with you in this argument, so I apologize if it came off that way. |
Re: Colbert is Rude
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
In other cases, facts are very useful. The sky is blue is a fact. Fred Thompson said "blah blah blah" or whatever quote is a fact. On June 11, 2007, Sen. Larry Craig was arrested at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport on suspicion of lewd conduct is a fact. Using these facts and other facts to arrive at a logical conclusion to support your argument is a very very strong form of persuasion. I prefer this form of argument, because as far as I know it's the strongest form. Prof. S is very good at this, you are very poor. So am I, but when I'm not willing to take the time to make a logical argument, I usually just stop talking instead of repeating my opinion over and over without any useful form of argument. Quote:
How about Dylflon coming in in the middle of a discussion and writing a long monologue about his harbored feelings about Prof. S for the last several years, and then telling him in the end to "eat a dick". Does that sound like someone not letting the words get to them? That's what bugs me about you. You sure sound like you're taking words to heart, but because all we see is text, we can't gauge your emotions and so you can always fall back on the "I'm just joking" or "I'm just being sarcastic" to many times weasel out of anything you just said. |
Re: Colbert is Rude
Quote:
|
Re: Colbert is Rude
Quote:
That is a fact. I'm not agreeing with what Dylan said, nor do I really care - to be honest with you. And yes, I did say I wouldn't argue with him anymore. But if you look back, me and Strangler were'nt arguing. We were agreeing, and then talking about the different sides of the situation. Quote:
PS. Holy fuck. Double post. I haven't done that in about 4 years. I need to go bathe. |
Re: Colbert is Rude
Quote:
And Mana brings it up that he disagrees with me, yet did not tell me to "eat a dick". This was a topic where there are no real facts to cite, just analysis of a show's content. Hence how civil it was until some decided to be a "shit stirrer", and it definitely wasn't. And please stop saying he was just trying to get a rise out of me. He expounded upon how much he dislikes me in more than one post. He was venting because he had nothing else to say. |
Re: Colbert is Rude
I'm going to throw in my actual opinion of Colbert/Stewart and intellectual dishonesty just for fun.
I don't think what they do is as the professor said, "intellectually dishonest". The beginning of the Bush administration was a time of heavy censorship and many artists were put in a lot of trouble with the media for speaking out against the government (a good example being the Dixie Chicks). What Colbert does is make his jokes ambiguous. He portrays himself as an ultra-right wing conservaChristian causing most of his humour to come from satire. Nobody could rightfully prove though that what Colbert does is in fact satire though. This ambiguous nature of Colbert's comedy cushions Colbert from getting in trouble. I don't think this is so much out of dishonesty as it is Colbert protecting his own ass. Stewart just likes to poke fun at news events and will in fact take things out of context. But as Typhoid mentioned earlier, he is not the first to do this. Canadian programs like This Hour Has 22 Minutes, Royal Canadian Air Farce, and the Rick Mercer Report have been doing this for years. In fact, they've been doing it in a much more extreme manner than their American coutnerparts. But as a Canadian I have never felt it to be 'dishonest'. These shows while making some pointed attacks are more there to make fun of the twisted and crazy world we live in rather than to misinform and indoctrinate. Also, Canadians in general are okay with making fun of the government, because criticism of the government is actually a very important thing. I believe the case to be the same for Colbert and Stewart. They are there to make light of a scary and stressful world. But also in doing so, they point out relevant issues and contradictions in the government system. One of the things I've noticed as a difference between Canadians and Americans is that a lot of Americans have adopted the notion that it's not okay to question their government. And a lot of programs won't openyl criticize the government out of this sentimentality and also probably out of fear of being cancelled. Colbert and Stewart fill an important niche. While they may be left-leaning, they actually do make fun of left-wing politicians whenever they can. They are two programs out there that have the guts to make fun of the stupid stuff that goes on in the government. And it actually is an important thing to do. But if they're going to make fun of the government all the time, they do really have to protect themselves. That's why they perform their comedy the way they do. I think callingg them intellectually dishonest is unfair. I think they are intelligent human beings who in many circumstances ask the right questions at the right times. They push the correct boundaries and get a lot of people to think and almost as importantly to laugh. Some people may see them as leftist propagandists who are out to fulfill some sort of personal anti-government agenda, but think of who they are. They are comedians and entertainers who are telling jokes. Not the news. If you're calling them intellectually dishonest, you may as well accuse every satirist who ever lived of the same thing. |
Re: Colbert is Rude
Quote:
You want to know something funny? I told the good ol' Prof to munch a Bratwurst simply because I was bored and tired and wanted to take a cheap shot at him for fun. The joke being that I have a giant long build up with the simple message of requesting him to gargle a dong. I could have just told to to gargle dongs up front. But I made a big long article out of it. In all honesty I was just fucking around. Was it immature? Yes. Really immature in fact. But don't mistake me for some inarticulate mouth breather who gets all huffy when other people have opinions that differ from mine. And more importantly don't think me someone of such low standing that I have to resort to childishness because I can't express my own views in a clear, reasonable, and well thought out manner. You've actually annoyed me more than the Prof has in a few short sentences that make it sound like you know anything about me. Granted, my actions in this thread aren't the best indicator of how I really am. But anyways, ramble, ramble, chortle a trouser snake. |
Re: Colbert is Rude
I'm only a timid observer here, but isn't the issue just the fact that everyone should be serious during a serious discussion of an issue? This is an internet forum, so seriousness is always an issue, but you can't insult the other person you're discussing with and then try to have an informed discussion.
|
Re: Colbert is Rude
Quote:
Plus as I recall it's you who thinks he knows Prof. S so well. Quote:
|
Re: Colbert is Rude
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:38 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern