GameTavern

GameTavern (http://www.gametavern.net/forums/index.php)
-   Happy Hour (http://www.gametavern.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   Challenge 5: Army Time (http://www.gametavern.net/forums/showthread.php?t=17898)

jeepnut 04-17-2008 08:59 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
One more!

thatmariolover 04-17-2008 08:59 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
One.

Yoda9864 04-17-2008 08:59 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Stuff2

manasecret 04-17-2008 08:59 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
51

Jason1 04-17-2008 08:59 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Im here!

Yoda9864 04-17-2008 09:00 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
One more?

jeepnut 04-17-2008 09:00 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Challenge over!

manasecret 04-17-2008 09:00 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
52 -- UN WON BY ONLY 2!!!!!!!!

Great save by Yoda! Would've been a tie otherwise

thatmariolover 04-17-2008 09:00 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
It's the final countdown!

jeepnut 04-17-2008 09:00 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
That's it. Tally it up.

Bond 04-17-2008 09:04 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Artificial post count boost = happy times.

jeepnut 04-17-2008 09:07 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by manasecret (Post 220305)
52 -- UN WON BY ONLY 2!!!!!!!!

Great save by Yoda! Would've been a tie otherwise

I count 22 for USA. How do you get 52 for UN?

BreakABone 04-17-2008 09:13 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bond (Post 220308)
Artificial post count boost = happy times.

Artificial post count?
All legit.
Nothing articifial about it!

Quote:

Originally Posted by manasecret (Post 220305)
52 -- UN WON BY ONLY 2!!!!!!!!

Great save by Yoda! Would've been a tie otherwise

Working on the honor system here.
The UN wins!

(I already scored it)
So 3 in a row for domination.
Let's see if challenge 6 goes the same way.

jeepnut 04-17-2008 09:18 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BreakABone (Post 220310)
Artificial post count?
All legit.
Nothing articifial about it!



Working on the honor system here.
The UN wins!

(I already scored it)
So 3 in a row for domination.
Let's see if challenge 6 goes the same way.

I still don't see how UN won. There is no way they could have got 52 points if I understand the game correctly.

manasecret 04-17-2008 09:23 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
52 wasn't my point count, it was only my post count. Just something to make sure I didn't post the same thing twice in a row (which I ended up doing once anyway).

But I miscounted anyway, we actually one by four. EDIT: And by four, I mean ten. Yeesh all these numbers are making me cross-eyed.

UN: 32
AM: 22
CA: 6

At least, I think. I was eight off the first time I counted so...

Yoda9864 04-17-2008 09:38 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
I counted 25 for the UN.....:confused:

BreakABone 04-17-2008 09:42 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Well results will vary but these are my numbers and Swan can double check.

UN- 30
USA- 23
Canada- 7

Jason1 04-17-2008 10:03 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Bah sorry I missed this guys.

Fox 6 04-17-2008 10:10 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
cool a challenge! rock. too bad i missed out :P

jeepnut 04-18-2008 02:44 AM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BreakABone (Post 220316)
Well results will vary but these are my numbers and Swan can double check.

UN- 30
USA- 23
Canada- 7

Just wanted to make sure someone actually counted. I invested a lot of time in this challenge and wanted to make sure my efforts were recognized. :)

manasecret 04-18-2008 09:38 AM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Jeepnut, you got the most points out of anyone. You had like a ten point roll there for awhile, and then like ten more right after that but broken up every once in awhile. What was your secret, sir?

jeepnut 04-18-2008 01:25 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by manasecret (Post 220348)
Jeepnut, you got the most points out of anyone. You had like a ten point roll there for awhile, and then like ten more right after that but broken up every once in awhile. What was your secret, sir?

I tried my best to figure out the exact time to post according to my wristwatch. Turns out if I clicked post reply halfway between 41 and 42 seconds on my watch, I usually got it. You were rolling too for a while. Were you using the same method?

manasecret 04-18-2008 02:04 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jeepnut (Post 220369)
I tried my best to figure out the exact time to post according to my wristwatch. Turns out if I clicked post reply halfway between 41 and 42 seconds on my watch, I usually got it. You were rolling too for a while. Were you using the same method?

Haha, yep, except I was using my Windows system clock, which also has that second hand in there. I had it figured out early on that I needed to click sometime between 53 and 54 seconds, but closer to the 53 side. Wristwatch was probably better, since the length of the Windows seconds would vary slightly, since the CPU is too busy doing a bunch of other crap for it to be exact.

Then I figured out using the mouse would sometimes cause me to miss the button. So I used Tab to highlight the button and all I had to do was press Enter on the keyboard.

thatmariolover 04-18-2008 02:11 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by manasecret (Post 220371)
Haha, yep, except I was using my Windows system clock, which also has that second hand in there. I had it figured out early on that I needed to click sometime between 53 and 54 seconds, but closer to the 53 side. Wristwatch was probably better, since the length of the Windows seconds would vary slightly, since the CPU is too busy doing a bunch of other crap for it to be exact.

Then I figured out using the mouse would sometimes cause me to miss the button. So I used Tab to highlight the button and all I had to do was press Enter on the keyboard.

Haha I was doing the same thing. But you're right, it's slightly off. Honestly though, there's no excuse for that. There should always be enough CPU to do an accurate measurement of time.

manasecret 04-18-2008 02:28 PM

Re: Challenge 5: Army Time
 
The measurement is generally very accurate. But all kinds of delays have to be taken in account when taking that accurate measurement from deep down in the cpu somewhere and displaying it to the screen. You have to contend with all kinds of threads running at the same time, all trying to take up the CPU time, and consider that the little system clock display is not considered a high priority thread. Then you have the delays inherent in sending the value to RAM and then back out the RAM through to the video card or whatever traversing is needed, finally on to the screen. There are so many variables there, that while possible to get a super accurate clock display, it's just not worth the trouble.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern