![]() |
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Quote:
|
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Quote:
Phf. Says you. Though 6-6, they are tied for 1st in the NFC West my friend. *Looks at the other teams in the NFC West in Detail* *Re-thinks stance* |
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Here's a good ?
What's worse. NFC or NBA's Eastern Confrence I say the NBA's East. Nobody there that's as good as the Iggles. |
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Marvin Harrison signs 7 year extension worth $67 mill...Colts GM Bill Polian made a nice move by arranging a roster bonus which will only have Marvin count $3.2 mill against the cap next year, making room for the signing of Edgerrin James, among other players.
Which makes it official: Peyton Manning and Marvin Harrison will go down as the best QB>WR combo ever. ![]() |
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Quote:
Slow your roll man, slow you're roll, they're not that good yet. |
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Quote:
As far as QB>WR hookups are concerned, Manning and Harrison own the completion record (imagine what it'll be like in 5 years), and are closing in on the yardage and TD records (which will be forgotten in 5 years). They'll win a Superbowl or 2...the late 80's 49ers > present day Colts...but Manning > Harrison will go down as the most prolific hookup in history. |
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Stu, its all about the bowls. You can say that Rice and Montana were on a better team all you like, but to that all you have to say is...
4 Superbowl Rings. Until Harrison and Manning get at LEAST 2, I wouldn't even start debating this. |
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
so Dilfer>Stokley will be looked back on as a better tandem than Manning>Harrison?
|
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Stu, we're not talking about one Superbowl powered by a killer defense... we're talking about a dynasty that won superbowls, broke records, etc.
Manning/Harrison can be as good as there is, but they'll never be looked at the same way as Rice/Montana until they get a little ice on their fingers. You know this. |
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
And with the Colt's lackluster defense, it'll be at least another season before we see them in the Superbowl.
|
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
you can say that about 29 teams. which 2 teams WILL be in the Superbowl? The Colts have a shot, they're on fire
oh, and their defense isnt as bad as everyone thinks. Number one in the league in takeaways, best turnover differential in the NFL, most forced fumbles and fumble recoveries. they give up a lot of yards, but that's because teams have to air the ball out from the 2nd quarter on |
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Bill Simmons always makes good points.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...simmons/041210 Quote:
|
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
um...nobody is expecting the Colts to beat the Pats and Steelers on the road back-to-back. he created his own angle to make himself look like a genius...
Colts would be underdogs in both cases... oh, and he does have a grudge against Manning. "ive had it with this guy. making his O-Lineman sit in their 3 point stance for 40 seconds every play. I bet they all wanna throw their hairdryers into his cold tub after each game. him breaking marino's record would be just as bad as Bonds with his 8 and a half inch head breaking Aaron's record" all while Peyton feels uncomfortable talking about individual statistics after each game no grudge there :rolleyes: |
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Honestly, if your not picking a Pittsburgh-Philly Super Bowl at this point, your out of your mind.
|
Re: The NFL thread 2004-2005
Quote:
bookmark this thread |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:16 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern