The kiddy/mature thing doesnt bother me, gameplay was, is and always will be the most important factor. People call Mario 64 kiddy. I played it and it was great. Weather it is kiddy or not is a stupid excuse to hate it, Pokémon is the prime example of this, people think, meh pokémon, kiddy, crap. But the truth is its actually a great game.
Now back to the subject of Zelda. I feel that with the N64 it had finally found its place and its format in 3D even though LttP was great it was a used format. When I saw the spaceworld video I was stunned, finally graphics to match the gameplay. Then he came out with this cell shaded thing, admitidly I was annoyed, the sence of realism for the next game that had developed within was lost. But honestly, I am intrigued by the game and as I said before at the end of the day gameply is what counts.
Now I agree with Jin if Miyamoto wanted to experiment with this technology he should have made a new franchise altogeher a case of 'if it aint broke dont fix it' has taken place.
Anyway how do we know that this isnt a mixture of the two images we saw, spaceworld and cel shaded. People believe it is a remake of the first Zelda game, it could start off with Link as an adult in spaceworld visuals and then he falls asleep into the world of cel shading and dreams of when he was a kid. Does that sound so unbelieveable, the truth is we dont know what to expect and we have to wait and see.
|