Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Typhoid
Get rid of Nashville and Atlanta for sure....Wtf do they have a team for?....do they know what hockey even is? And ya, i say give Canada back Quebec and Winnipeg...but no shortened seasons...i cant stand that idea. They are making millions of dollars, and they want to play less. I say if anything, if they want shorter seasons, then salaries must also go drastically down.
|
its not about giving the teams back. they didnt leave to give them somewhere else. im sure the NHL would have prefered a team stayin winnipeg and other places. but when they cant afford to have the team any longer the options are limited.
Shortened season is a GREAT idea. its not about what the players wnat to play less or anything, its about the NHL doing well. and if you want to see the NHL get more popular, there are some things that have to change. the long ass season doesnt suit hockey well when most consider it pointless and say it gets boring.
i love as much hockey as i can get but IMO, i MUCH rather see playoff games come sooner. and with less games they'll get to the playoffs that much quicker.
The inter conference play i am still werry about. i think they need to move some teams around to get the deviding line more equal.
[EDIT] BTW, did anyone predict a sweep for the sharks? lol. Sharks arent handing colorado thier ass's, They're mailing em back to Denver for them.