View Single Post

Re: EA vs ESPN ----> NHL 2005
Old 08-18-2004, 01:10 PM   #15
Typhoid
Anthropomorphic
 
Typhoid's Avatar
 
Typhoid is offline
Location: New Caladonia
Now Playing:
Posts: 9,511
Default Re: EA vs ESPN ----> NHL 2005

Quote:
Originally Posted by Null

when you get into the actual game tho, graphics mean so little. EA is a high scoring arcade style, which goals can get up into the 20's. EA hockey games always have the one way that seems to always score. This year its thier new wrap around goal. EGM already says it scores at least 50% of the time. which is just unacceptable.



Then just edit the difficulty and aggression of the computer, ive never had a game go that high. In one player, the highest i got goals was i think 8. But i play on "Hard" with high aggresion, stick-checking,and blocking.

To me, graphics mean so much, because its a gme i play. I dont sim a season, i dont do that. The game is meant to be played, as in, playing the games, not simming everything.

Thats why graphics mean so much to me.

Its just to me, the graphics for the ESPN game look outdated. Judging by the horrible graphics, the gameplay better be the best gameplay ever made for any hockey game ever.

If i wanted a game that was only good for the off season stuff, sure, id get ESPN, and only ESPN, but i want a game that i ca play. A game with stunning graphics, that makes the people watching forget sometimes that it isnt real hockey.
__________________
Fingerbang:
1.) The sexual act where a finger is inserted into the vagina or anus.
Headbang:
1.) To vigorously nod your head up and down.

Last edited by Typhoid : 08-18-2004 at 01:18 PM.
  Reply With Quote