Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Canyarion
Sit down and take a tike to think about what you just typed. 
Since nobody needs games, you think one can't innovate a game.
Think of 3D. Did we NEED 3D? No, but it was just so much more fun. Did we NEED more buttons on controllers? No, but they were able to develop more functions in games.
Do we NEED a touch screen? Nope, but it sure is FUN! 
You don't play a game just to beat it, do you? I think most people play them for entertainment, so touch screen mini-games are a nice addition to the gaming experience.
Thank you, thank you! *bows* |
That is the weakest argument i've seen yet. lol. congrats for that.
was good for a laugh tho.
[edit] eh, wasnt really going to go more into that post hehe, but theres nothing else to post on.
Do we need games? All work and no play makes jack a dull dull boy.
Do we need ways to control games tho? Yes.
And does a touch screen make controlling thoes games easier? nope. more like a pain in the ass it sounds like.
Does the touch screen make more fun? for a bout 5 seconds.
When its used as a pocketPC, for pocket pc type games yes its fine and usefull. i love some of the games on my pocket pc, and it makes games like solitare easier.
But thoes sure as hell are the type of games i'd be buying a DS for. i'd be buying a DS for Mario, Zelda, metroid, f zero things like that.... and for thoes all i want and need is a dpad and buttons.
well scratch that, i'd love a analog stick. *glances at psp*
hmm...pocket pc.... *goes and plays punchout on pocketpc*