Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason1
So your blaming 9/11 on the Clinton Era? Please. You cant blame 9/11 on anybody. But you can blame the Bush Administration for how poorly they handled the situation. Instead of actually finding and capturing the person that is responsible for 9/11, they go and finish what daddy Bush started, which had nothing to do with 9/11. FACE THE FACTS: Hussien might have been a bad man, but he had NOTHING to do with what happened on 9/11. But hey, we got him right? While Osama runs free in the desert...
go watch Farienheit 911.
|
I have seen it, and it is possibly one of the most dishonest and truthfully bankrupt films ever made. The sheer number of lies of omission and lies of editing are astounding.
go watch FahrenHYPE 9/11 or just read this:
http://www.davekopel.org/terror/59Deceits.pdf
I'm not just blaming Clinton, btw. It was everyone's fault during that time, including Bush in his presidency before that date. Here's the facts: Bin Laden attacked the US and US interests at least 4 times during Clinton's presidency, including the first World Trade attack (not fact, but most evidence supports it)... and he sent a cruise missile into an empty camp in retalliation. Thats it. His own aids have admitted to this and his chief advisor at the time, Dick Morris, believes that Clinton was a complete incompetant when it came to battling the terrorist problem.
My worry is not about the past or blamer, however, it is about repeating the mistakes we have made before and actually looking at the war in Iraq through the eyes of a rational being and not a shoot from the hip "give peace a chance" simple-minded mongoloid. If we pull out of Iraq or attempt to "manage" the middle east, we are done for.
Iraq was intended to be a jumping ground for the future war on terrorism, IMO. It had the best infrastructure in the whole of the Middle East and large base of educated citizens. Even as of the last poll I saw over 60% of them did not want the US Military to leave before their country established a solid government. See how educated they are? It was in the hope that democracy could breed in the area, and the jury is still out on this matter. It will take more than a handful of years to see if an entire region's political idealogy can change with influence. I think that we could have done this much better than Rumsfeld did, but I don't think this policy should be abandoned.
Also ask yourself this question, Jason:
If the Democrats are going to lead the world to peace and freedom, why are the terrorists celebrating the fact that they won?
Now here is the next question: Which 2 sentences is Jason going to concentrate on responding to this time, while ignoring every other argument I make (and it's reasoning)?