Quote:
Originally Posted by manasecret
I'm only posting on this article that Prof. S mentioned, which says --
Which, unless I'm reading it wrong, says that he only voted against it because the measure was worded in such a way that defined all fetuses as children, which would threaten the right to abortion.
The article is unclear, so I may be wrong, but from my understanding that seems to be the case.
|
That is his explanation of the his decision, but like you, I don't know the exact wording of it. But considering his stance on partial birth abortion (a process that literally sucks the brain from a partially delivered late term child), I find it hard to give him the benefit of the doubt on this.
Regardless of his motivations, it will be quite easy for Republicans to have a field day with his decision on this.