[manasecret]

Professor S's logic is even worse than mine last round. This round, however, my logic is impeccable.

I think my line of thinking from last round has proven a house of cards, and as I said in Round 2, I think Fox 6's reaction to being targeted in that round with anger/exasperation makes him look innocent. My correspondence with him privately also seems to corroborate that.

Professor S, on the other hand, led the charge against Typhoid last round. He is again leading the charge this round. He seems far too eager to kill another without much thought to reason. Despite what he says about fully explaining his reason, he really hasn't. Read his posts.

Plus, his guarantee of letting us vote for him next round if Fox 6 is indeed innocent, is not much of an offer. I believe he is orchestrating a sacrifice of himself for the greater Other cause. One more round of ONLY survivor deaths, after two rounds of it, would be well worth it for the Others in exchange for Prof. S's sacrifice next round.

My guess is he's guilty. I !vote Professor S.