[Professor S]

No, you said the issue as "not a bipartisan one" to quote you, and I think you either meant bipartisan or really didn't mean to put in the word "not".

Either way, I edited my comments to refect that confusion about your intention. I agree with you on the bipartsan nature of the problem, but my reaction was to what you wrote, not what you meant to write. I think the facts about McCains stance were very enlightening, though, and if most people knew that the olls would change greatly... but you won't see the press touch it.

I still think you have greatly overreacted the Bond's post, especially considering a lot of the other partisan bickering that has been going on around here. This place is the partisan hit parade, and to single out Bond's post as being specifically partisan, and it was to a point but not accusatory or inflammatory in any way unlike most partisan posts here, I think shows an issue you might have with Bond and not specifically what he posted. Honestly I was surprised by your reaction to it.