Quote:
|
The 3DS will do poorly in sales because the consumer is not yet ready for 3D. I submit that this is false for the reasons given, namely the humongous success of Avatar.
|
Avatar was 3 hour 20 dollar movie.
The 3DS is a handheld game system with a screen smaller than your hand.
I don't know what you're not getting about the fact that the 3D illusion is ruined
when you look off screen. 3D in
any movie is shit when you're looking at things not in 3D.
Being that the screen is so small, the real world will
always be in your peripheral vision, unless you're jamming your face against the screen.
I wasn't saying people aren't ready for 3D as a whole. 3D has been around for 20+ years.
I said 3D hasn't been tested in consoles or handhelds, so
nobody including myself can definitively say it will or will not work. Which is why I'm stating opinions which you feel have to be needlessly argued with.
3D is tacky. It's a fad.
The reason Avatar sold well was because it wasn't standard 3D, it was like 3Dplus, not to mention it meshed real visuals with CGI seemlessly.
It didn't sell well
because of 3D.
3D being viewed as successful is a by-product of Avatar releasing it in 3D.
If they didn't do it in 3D, and just had the human/CGI mesh, would you say that the next handheld should combine CGI and real life characters? Why not focus on that, instead.