Quote:
Originally posted by nWoCHRISnWo
You don't need to have the best mic skills, hopefully this means less time with the champion making 20 minute promos and more time having 20 minute matches.
|
But still, the champ should have more carisma... you saw how well WWE was doing when Big show was the champ. That had to be the longest most boring champoinship run ever... why? because he lacked skills on the mic, and he never built himself up to the status he had to hold.
Goldberg is an example of a silent champion. The only difference is that goldberg started out on WCW Saturday night, and worked himself up the ranks to become champion. Oh, and even then, he wasn't the most exciting champ to wacth was he?
I look at Lensar, and I see a guy who debut less than a year ago, won no other champoinships, and never defeated a WWE champ on the big stage (if I'm wrong prove it please)... Why is he a worthy champ?
Lets look at the other options... Undertaker, Tripple H, Shawn Michaels, The Rock, Kurt Angle, Chris Jericho, hell, any of those guys have a better resume than Brock... and before each of them won thier first titles they still had a better resume.
Then there are the people never to hold the belt who deserve a chance: Chris Beniot, ROB VAN DAM, Booker T, Test... He doesn't deserve it half as much as any of these guys. Not to mention they let him beat the biggest guy in the industry clean
Quote:
|
Which reminds me, Brock Lesnar is a damn good wrestler, and that's exactly what the champ should be. He's huge and intimidating, and without being great on the mic that sometimes works (Just like Chris Benoit's "silent ass kicker" thingy). Besides, Brock has Paul Heyman with him at all times, and Paul Heyman is a master mic worker.
|
Chris Beniot talks... and Brock should learn some skills of his own before he starts sounding as dumb as Goldberg.