Quote:
Originally posted by quiet mike
it would grow the library of the console, which is the main seller in this age, not quality, quantity.
|
Which is totally against what Nintendo says they are for, quality over quantity.
Small problem there.
Quote:
Originally posted by GameKinG
Yeah, there are millions of nintendo fans. And MS screwed us over by buying them as an exclusive company instead of Activision or somebody...I dont blame nintendo for taking the money.
|
Oh, I see... So it would be ok if say Burger King bought out Rare, but it's not ok if Microsoft does? I see, that makes a whole lot of sense. You blame Microsoft for buying Rare, but you don't blame Nintendo for taking the money. You have to realize Nintendo gave up Rare, they left it there open for people to buy. It does not matter if Activison or if Microsoft would have bought it, Nintendo gave up Rare. If you blame Microsoft for buying Rare, then you have to blame Nintendo for taking the money. It doesn't work that way man; both companies benefited leave it at that. You can't blame one another because each agreed and each benefited from the situation. Maybe in the end we'll see you made the smarter business move, but for now each company agreed to it fair and square. If you blame only one company than you are missing something.