You just had to suck me in to this BS huh?
Quote:
Originally posted by gekko
5 isn't many. And considering how much was added to PSO, it's still worth a buy for DC owners.
|
5 isn't many? DC
DIED in early 2001... half a year before GCN and Xbox were even released! And they still have ports on the way.
They are just being cheap... I would have canned all 5 games to get Shenume 3, or a Sonic Adventure 3... being a DC owner, these ports are worthless.
Quote:
|
The only problem with you showing scores from IGN is that it doesn't mean ****.
|
It doesn't? Then why did you post this?
http://www.gametavern.net/forums/sho...&threadid=3006
Funny huh? Seems what IGN says doesn't mean "****" unless sega wins... right? This is pathetic.
Quote:
|
EA sells games in terms of quantity, not quality. 99% of EAs games are pure ****, and occasionally one or two slip through the cracks.
|
What does that make Sega?
IMO, Sega is no more than an EA wannabe. Once they turned third party, they turned crap.
I will be the first to admit, they have FARRRRRRRRRRRR more potiential than EA to make great games, but they aren't trying to do that. Like idiots they are trying to compete with EA. I cant't wait to see next year's sport games.. they don't have the resources like EA, so they will not be even close to an improvement over this year.... hell, NBA and NFL 2k3 weren't much of an improvement over last year.
Not to say EA just goes the extra mile with every game, but you would be hard pressed to find sombody who likes any 2002 games more than thier 2003 counterparts... Go to game faqs and look at the NBA 2k3 boards, or the NFL 2k3 boards, lots of people keep saying the 2k2 season was better.
And what's with Sega's new found buggyness? Ps2's NBA game screws completly up when you download a rosted update... and on GCN one out of every three games played it frezes up!
Sega needs to stop trying to compete with EA, and stop porting from DC, and start making some original games that are quality.
Sega is a better developer than EA. But as long as they keep trying to be like EA they will stay ****ty.
Quote:
Here's what you're comparing:
EA Sports: ****ty games, but you got 50 new games to choose from each month
|
that's your opinion... IMO EA releases one quality title per month. Ground breaking title? No. Quality? Yes. That's the model Sega is trying to follow, but they are so far behind it's sad.
Quote:
|
Sega: Great games that take a while to develop, and in the meantime, some ports from outstanding DC games on the side.
|
ROFL
Sega? Taking Time you say? LMFAO
Yeah, I sure they took years to finish Sonic Adventure 2, Toe Jam and Earl, Shenume 3, Beach Spikers, Sega Soccoer Slam, Etc.
Quote:
|
What was the last good game EA had? SSX? I rest my case.
|
Damn you are a EA hatin Sega fanboy
Maybe you should read this again:
http://www.gametavern.net/forums/sho...&threadid=3643
Oh, nm, You are just saying SSX is thier last great game based off of your opinion. Just like EA is crap in your opinion.
Lets take a poll, every game sell a vote.... now who is the best damn developer?
Sega wishes they could beat EA, but the sad truth is they can't, and they never will be able to. What now?
I'm not saying EA is the best, but because you are acting like it's a fact that they suck ass, it has to come down to this. Maybe you were one of that very exclusive group of 2,000 guys to buy NCAA 2k3 in the nation
Sega needs to do like Konami and Capcom and other little developers and know thier role... then they might acctually be able to make somthing quality.