Quote:
Originally posted by Joeiss
My original statement was made intending on what Saddam has done allready, not what he could do.
I see your point, but I still do not think that Saddamn is THAT big of a problem on the world scale.
|
And as for my original post...
Quote:
Originally posted by Rndm_Perfection
Due to little disagreements for personal welfare, someone like Saddam is going to be permitted to be the next Adolph Hitler. And... Hitler didn't need "weapons of mass destruction" to do some damage. The threat is not the opponents weapons, but rather our self-caution.
|
Take note that what I said was
not in past-tense. That is, I never claimed that Saddam's actions were equal to that of Hitler's. Instead, I claimed that his potential could lead him to be equal or greater of a threat.
As for that little statement:
Quote:
Originally posted by Jason1
Why dont we go to war blah blah blah...?
The answer to that question is simple...thousands of American lives will be lost. Is it really worth it? You guys wouldnt be saying ''oh just go to war allready!'' if you were being drafted or had to fight.
|
Hah... that's just the "self-caution" that would end up costing more lives than necessary! People who think that way are people who act after multiple warnings. What, must Saddam hit home to you personally before you feel he should be dealt with?
American lives is a small price to pay to get rid of a global threat. And yes, he does indeed have the potential to become a global threat.