"What do they rely on?"
Uranium-lead dating. Thorium dating. Strontium-rubidium dating. Helium dating. Fission track dating. There are many, and not one of them depends on the same variables that C14 dating does.
"Well, let's see, you claim to be skeptical about everything, but you believe in things you haven't seen or studied for yourself."
I trust the experts on quantum mechanics to give good quantum mechanics data. I trust tose who study biology to give good biology data. Etc, etc.
The entire scientific realm is too vast to be understood by a single human. It takes the combined efforts of thousands of people forming, combinig, testing, rejecting and unifying theories to make any sense out of this vastly complicated system we're in.
And there are those who jst say "bollocks to it - if I believe in god, I can explain it all away myself." Fine by me, you go ahead and do so. Just not my cuppa tea. I don't want to believe. Not when I can know.
"When you get pissed off, you lose the debate, period."
Illogical assumption. I am impatient that you totally fail to grasp my reasoning why I believe what I believe. Just because someone loses their cool a bit, they're automatically wrong? In that case, all the born agains, all the jehovahs witnesses, all of my grandparents who tried to convince me that god exists were wrong too?
"When you learned about Gravity, were you skepticle?"
No, because gravity can be seen. I am sceptical of the theory of gravitation if that's what you mean.
"do you believe that the world is round?"
Because for the main part pictures taken have shown it to be round. But it would also be mathematically impossible for the world to exist if it weren't.
Ever wondered why the shadow cast on the moon is curved? Funnily enough, if you work it out geometrically, it seems to suggest that the earth is an ellipsoidal body of rock with a radius of approximately 6400km.
"from the abouve questions, what personal experience proves it?"
Why do I need a personal experience to prove it? I don't go about proving things on personal experience, I go about by actually looking at stuff.
I would be intruiged to find out what your "point" is. In the meantime, brush up on your arguing technique
here.