Quote:
Originally posted by Joeiss
No, you misunderstood me. US was not involved at all with European interests at this time. Yet, you said that US let Germany become a global threat... But no... They didn't really let them, because they weren't even like... I don't know how to say it... Umm....
Lets just put it like this. Britain let Germany become a global threat, not America.
|
It's just more of the same old "We weren't involved, so we can't take the blame" talk. By doing nothing, and by having no relations with Europe; by practicing isolationism, America did, too, "let it happen".
I could easily go around and say "Africa let it happen too"... but that wouldn't seem right for only one reason. Africa didn't have the
ability to do anything about Germany.
*shrugs* Korea is like a child with a new toy. Their threat could result in one of many outcomes... and I doubt that one of the outcomes would be bombing their supplies. Maybe Korea will bomb one of our allies... that'd start up mass cooperation/retaliation.
But, I feel that if all attention is put on Korea, and Saddam is ignored... then Saddam will have the free time to plan what he so desires to.
Threaded Mode
