MAFIA Scooby Doo Round 2

[TheSlyMoogle]

I'm going to have to go with Mana. After pulling the enchanter stunt, he confused most of the first round. He was posting every 5 minutes it seemed trying to save himself. Thanks to his random posts, we lost Swan, a good villager. My theory is Mana is a regular mafioso, trying to pretend to be enchanter first, then a villager second to confuse us. If he is enchanter, then this will be a vote that reveals him to us, and we'll know not to vote for him again, until we're sure all mafia members are gone. If he is however just a regular mafia member, then... I say we get Mana out of this game before he can cause anymore trouble, and let the mafia get to us all.

!Vote Mana

[jeepnut]

Vote Count:

BaBs - 2
jeepnut - 2
Combine 017 - 1
Schadenfreude - 1
Bube - 1
takinggiantsteps - 1
ZebraRampage - 1
Manasecret - 1

[Bond]

Schadenfreude is suspiciously quiet, and jumped on the BaB bandwagon after I cast the first vote.

!Retract BreakABone

!Vote Schadenfreude

[Combine 017]

I have a few theorys up in the air.
Lets say Earl isnt mafia and hes right about Schadenfreude.
So we vote him off, and if he is mafia, then we know BaBs can be trusted, but if he isnt then BaBs was wrong and theres a good chance he is mafia so we vote him off next round. We can worry about Manas shenanigans later. Sound good to anyone else?

!retract Jeepnut


!vote Schadenfreude

[BreakABone]

Originally Posted by Combine 017

I have a few theorys up in the air.
Lets say Earl isnt mafia and hes right about Schadenfreude.
So we vote him off, and if he is mafia, then we know BaBs can be trusted, but if he isnt then BaBs was wrong and theres a good chance he is mafia so we vote him off next round. We can worry about Manas shenanigans later. Sound good to anyone else?

!retract Jeepnut


!vote Schadenfreude

There's one hole in your theory, but I'll bite

If Schadenfreude is innocent, I'll take the fall and even vote for myself.

[Thespis721]

I'm not convinced by these theories. Everything seems very shot in the dark. I was hoping in this last round at least someone would hit right and get the ball rolling on some evidence.

!vote mana

[BlueFire]

I have no clue who to vote for, especially since I haven't been particularly attentive this round. I don't know when I'm going to be able to vote again, or if I'll be conscious before 12:59 PM.. so..I guess I'll vote now. I'm placing my trust in BaB's judgment, especially his last post.

!vote Schadrenfreude

*crosses fingers*

[BlueFire]

Originally Posted by Thespis721

I'm not convinced by these theories. Everything seems very shot in the dark. I was hoping in this last round at least someone would hit right and get the ball rolling on some evidence.

!vote mana

Wait, what? The vote for mana is certainly a shot in the dark, too. What evidence do you have for his mafioso-nature?

[ZebraRampage]

Originally Posted by Combine 017

I have a few theorys up in the air.
Lets say Earl isnt mafia and hes right about Schadenfreude.
So we vote him off, and if he is mafia, then we know BaBs can be trusted, but if he isnt then BaBs was wrong and theres a good chance he is mafia so we vote him off next round. We can worry about Manas shenanigans later. Sound good to anyone else?

!retract Jeepnut


!vote Schadenfreude

During these first two rounds it seems like BaB has been a subject of mistrust, so maybe it would be good to clear this up. Schadenfreude also has the most votes so far, and nobody else is standing out, so I'm thinking I'll go with him too. Also, he has been really quiet, which is characteristic of the mafia being low key, as was said previously in this topic. I just can't remember who said it.

I think any vote is a shot in the dark too, but since there's a majority forming that has some theory behind it in what combine said, then I'll join.

Jeepnut, how do my theories read like a smoke screen? What I said about mana was very simplified. I know I changed my mind, but I did it because I really started to think he was joking. I don't know what else I can say about it.


!vote Schadenfreude

[Bube]

Originally Posted by thatmariolover

Your vote for Xantar was a vote for a Guardian. Why would that lead us to trust you?

When you think about it, there's no way I could've known that Xantar was the guardian. It was just a blind vote, based on a tiny suspicion.

Anyway, after reading the thread, I decide to !vote ZebraRampage

[magus113]

Oh Schadenfreude. From knowing how things go in the past mafias, I think the theory of the quiet ones is gonna have to apply to you.

Also no hard feelings Combine, I was seriously kinda taking jeepnut's first suggestion and running with it especially since I was still shooting in the dark as far as reasoning for voting went. SO:

!retract Combine 017
!vote Schadenfreude

[TheSlyMoogle]

I will hop onto this Schadenfreude bandwagon in hopes that we are correct.

!Retract Mana

!Vote Schadenfreude

I persist that mana must be voted next round, I say this now for it may be my last chance.

[Teuthida]

Jumping on bandwagons isn't good for the suspension.

[TheSlyMoogle]

Originally Posted by Teuthida

Jumping on bandwagons isn't good for the suspension.

I didn't jump, I hopped. Much lighter than jumping.

[Schadenfreude]

I'm only quiet because I don't usually post here. :P Earl kept prodding me to join.