Jurassic Park 4

Crash · 01-27-2005, 11:42 PM

Some of you may have read this already, but those who haven't:

Apparently crew members have been raving about how good the movie is going to be! The script is currently undergoing some "tinkering" though! The script is being rewritten by John Sayles, but is based on an earlier draft by a man called William Monahan.

Sam Neill and Jeff Goldblum will not appear, there will be a new character called Nick Harris.

Richard Attenbrough will have a cameo role.

Steven Spielberg has brought in a Paleontologist to help him on the story.

There will be marine reptiles in this one and giant feathered ones too.

SYNOPSIS

In the opening we see a Dinosaur attack on mainland US. Then we see that there have been isolated attacks in Mexico and Central America and the U.N has decided to send in a Task Force to eliminate the dinosaurs.
Nick Harris is the new hero. He is sort of a soldier of fortune. He is approached by Dr John Hammond to go back to Isla Nublar and breed new Dinosaurs at Jurassic Park. (Ones that can't reproduce.)
On arriving at Jurassic Park Nick is attacked by Excavaraptors (Like Trapdoor Spiders.) and security Guards working for a company called Grendel Corporation who have taken over security at JUrassic Park.
Nick finds a Shaving foam canister of DNA samples (The ones Nedry stole in the original movie.).
However the Grendel Corporation are after their own samples and capture Harris. He is taken to a castle in the Alps.
There he is introduced to Adrien Joyce a henchman of Baron Von Drax the C.E.O of Grendel Corporation.
He offers Nick a job of training the dinosaurs. They have secretly been breeding genetically modified Dinosaurs........

Jonbo298 · 01-28-2005, 12:37 AM

As long as it isn't as bad as JP3 (ugh), I'll give it a try.

Perfect Stu · 01-28-2005, 01:51 AM

JP2 and JP3 both sucked.

Blackmane · 01-28-2005, 02:36 AM

I've heard this same rumor too, that this #4 movie is supposed to be a lot better than the last two, like kind of going back to it's roots in #1

I really hope that is true. I would love to see the Jurassic Park series restored to glory.

Canyarion · 01-28-2005, 02:46 AM

Oh man, that sounds terrible!

How can this go back to its roots, if what Crash says is true????
"Soldier of fortune", "Excavaraptors", "castle", "genetically modified dinosaurs"....

Jonbo298 · 01-28-2005, 03:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perfect Stu

JP2 and JP3 both sucked.

I liked JP1 and JP2. JP3 is what turned me off so much (just from ever watching the 3rd one again, god forbid).

DeathsHand · 01-28-2005, 03:47 AM

I liked 2....... Although I've actually never seen 1 all the way through (seen most of it though), and havn't seen 3 at all......

Joeiss · 01-28-2005, 09:29 AM

I thought all three were great!

Null · 01-28-2005, 10:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perfect Stu

JP2 and JP3 both sucked.

yes, 2 and 3 were absolutly horrible. 2 being by far the worst one of them all. i know people who got up and walked out when the dinosour started attacking the main land. thank god i never paid to see any. lol.

4 tho, honestly by reading that script might even be worse then 2. hard to believe, but seriously doubt 4 will be any good at all.

Jonbo298 · 01-28-2005, 11:09 AM

How would you have kept the series with some twists then Null if you didn't go anywhere outside the island of those Dinosaurs? Claim more islands exist and for the next few movies, then investergate them?

Null · 01-28-2005, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonbo298

How would you have kept the series with some twists then Null if you didn't go anywhere outside the island of those Dinosaurs? Claim more islands exist and for the next few movies, then investergate them?

nope. woulda done the smart thing and ended it after 1.

they made the same mistake many many movies make. try and make up an extended story to make more money just cuz the first movie did well. The best sequals are the ones where the story was planed that way from the beginning. not tacked on after they found out the first movie was good.

Perfect Stu · 01-28-2005, 11:17 AM

Jurassic Park was a great movie...

but anyone who thought the 2nd and 3rd were "good" either have low standards, or doesnt know good cinema if it bit them in the ass

Joeiss · 01-28-2005, 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perfect Stu

Jurassic Park was a great movie...

but anyone who thought the 2nd and 3rd were "good" either have low standards, or doesnt know good cinema if it bit them in the ass

I thought they were good. I haven't seen them in a while, so my perspective might be a bit off.

Fox 6 · 01-28-2005, 12:07 PM

They should just Napalm the whole damn Dinosaur island.

Happydude · 01-28-2005, 12:23 PM

i thought the 3rd one was "meh"...i still havent seen the second one...and the first one was really good...i guess im hoping for the 4th one, but im not expecting it to be any good.