What do you prefer???

Happydude · 12-04-2003, 10:04 AM

i said innovation...

*shrugs and goes back to sleep*

Jonbo298 · 12-04-2003, 02:16 PM

If its a PC game thats innovative but rushed, updates/expansion packs can fix that

But I would prefer a game I can actually play. If a brand new game is innovative like above said, other companies will copy it and use the innovation to advance it, then by the time the company who introduced the innovation releases the sequel, it'll be better. (Jeez did that sound confusing)

GameMaster · 12-04-2003, 06:25 PM

Finished but standard.

Canyarion · 12-05-2003, 07:09 AM

I prefer revolutionary games that just aren't perfect. Do you know Myth? It's a RTS game with (half) 3D graphics and it was really cool for it's time. But it just didn't play that supergreat so it never got the credit it deserved.
Myth II was a great game, everything the original had but more and better. It's still one of my favorite games.

Of course games that have both things are the best, but those are rare...

Hero2 · 12-05-2003, 04:45 PM

It would all depend there are too many factors in the question

1. would they be desent new and inovative ideals
2. would the old game atleast be a good series or just a remake of a crappy game

it would all depend on the game some games are really good on gameplay others hae good eyecandy and other just suck but are fun to play for a while

but... I guess I would buy the new innovative game. then go back to the games I know are good if it sux too much