your fantasy prez and v.p.

[Professor S]

I can't for the life of me figure out what anyone sees in Dean.

Kerry I can see as President
Leiberman I can see as President
Even Gephardt I can see as President

Dean I can see as an a$$hole boss who eventually gets fired for groping his secretary at the office Christmas party and then blaming her when he's caught.

Oh, and I don't think Edwards could spell "potatoe" if he had a dictionary in front of him, so I see him as a Vice President.

Stonecutter, you're right. I would switch McCain to Pres and Powell to Vice.

[rottwylor]

I still think Hillary Clinton for prez... and Oprah for vice prez

[Stonecutter]

Originally Posted by The Strangler

I can't for the life of me figure out what anyone sees in Dean.

Dean I can see as an a$$hole boss who eventually gets fired for groping his secretary at the office Christmas party and then blaming her when he's caught.

I'll explain what I see in Dean if you explain that last sentence.

[GiMpY-wAnNaBe]

FOR THE RECORD!!!!!
batman ain't got nuttin on Superman....

anyways,
President of the united states - JO MAMA!!!
V.P. - Bill Clinton (while sexually harassing jo mama)

[Vampyr]

This is getting good. Two well thoughtout posts from two knowledgable people.

*grabs popcorn*

[EDIT]
(stoney posted this right when I did. I didnt see it before)

Originally Posted by Stonecutter

I had a great response to the other thread too, but my comp crashed. I don't feel like retyping it tonight.

Damn it.

[Professor S]

Originally Posted by Stonecutter

I'll explain what I see in Dean if you explain that last sentence.

Easy. He's an angry reactionist who seems to follow his impulses without fully thinking through the ramifications of them. Just take a look at the now infamous "Dean Scream".

One scream and his whole campaign is now a national joke.

One pinch on the secretary's a$$ and he's fired.

Now its your turn.

[Stonecutter]

Ok, maybe this was my fault on not being clear enough, but that's still not what I was looking for.


What about him makes you think that he would be

groping his secretary at the office Christmas party

?

[Rndm_Perfection]

Originally Posted by Stonecutter

Ok, maybe this was my fault on not being clear enough, but that's still not what I was looking for.


What about him makes you think that he would be ?

I've got a feeling that Strangler is pointing out that Dean's enthusiasm and lack of self-control in "exciting situations" could easily lead him to grobe the secretary at a Christmas party.

[Professor S]

Originally Posted by Rndm_Perfection

I've got a feeling that Strangler is pointing out that Dean's enthusiasm and lack of self-control in "exciting situations" could easily lead him to grobe the secretary at a Christmas party.

Thank you. I thought I was QUITE clear in my response, but I guess you have to beat some people over the head to get your point across sometimes.

And now that we are clear on my point, its time for you to explain to me exactly what makes Dean a great presidential candidate. And nothing with the term's "Bush" or "current administration" will be accepted as logical reasoning.

[Professor S]

Still waiting.

[Stonecutter]

Originally Posted by The Strangler

Thank you. I thought I was QUITE clear in my response, but I guess you have to beat some people over the head to get your point across sometimes.

And now that we are clear on my point, its time for you to explain to me exactly what makes Dean a great presidential candidate. And nothing with the term's "Bush" or "current administration" will be accepted as logical reasoning.

You still haven't given me a satisfactory response as to why a temper and a flair for the dramatic in less than ideal situations is even in the same area code as sexual assault. I think you're still equating democrat with Clinton and Clinton with womanizer. If you would have said "he's the kind of guy who would go bobby knight on his staffers" I'd disagree with you but I would still see where you're coming from. nevertheless, reasoning follows, but not before...

These questions: Why is it simply not enough that I or anyone else agree with him on the major issues? Why do you insist on grilling every democrat on why they support who they support. For someone who claims to be "conservative but not a republican" (which is total bull****, you're just a republican with a guilty conscience, I used to be one too, I know your game first hand,) you sure seem to have a higher opinion of people who will vote for bush. There are several things that I see in Dean, but none that I can file under the heading of "these are my political views and they're different from yours."

Such as:


1) Dean is not a warhawk. I'm not going to turn this into a "the Iraq war was/was not the right thing to do" debate, I didn't want the United States to go to war, George Bush took them to war, Howard Dean would not have. Kerry, Clark and Edwards (I think) did not start taking a hard anti-war stance until they started chasing Dean.

2) Dean values a woman's right to choose.

3) Dean has a conservationist stance on the environment.

4)Dean will roll back the tax cut. I'm no expert on the tax cut, but you cannot possibly believe that we're not going to touch social security, we're going to lower prescription drug costs, we're going to fund a war in Iraq, a war in Afghanistan, build a base on the moon, improve education, AND lower taxes. Even with Clinton administration taxes you couldn't do all of that. If you're wealthy and you don't give a **** about the lower classes then more power to you, vote for Bush, I'm not going to stop you, I'll even agree with your reasoning, no matter how wrong I think your beliefs are, but it doesn't make mine wrong,

So basically, I've looked at Dean's stances on the issues, and outside of Kusinich, I agree with him more than any other Democrat.

Also, Deep down, you must know that the “Dean would be a bad president because he can't control his temper” argument is about as intelligent as the “Bush is a dumbass” argument.