Great technology or weapon of mass destruction?

[Happydude]

i'll take pluto...that way i can say the planet is too small for more then 2 people


and as for it hurting the enviroment...wasn't project "Destiny" enough????

[Neo]

Originally Posted by happydude666

and as for it hurting the enviroment...wasn't project "Destiny" enough????

Yeah, just like that time greenhouse gases disolved the ozone and melted the icebergs covering the world in water, a water world if you will. It gave Kevin Costner gills. Gills for godsake, gills!!

[Stonecutter]

I've known about HAARP for about 10 years now. It's not a WMD, in that it doesn't target things, but I suppose that kind of thing (punching holes in the ionisphere) could cause a lot of damage to the environment, but I don't think you can accurately predict where that damage is going to go.

I used to have a ton of great info on this thing but I lost it awhile ago. My general opinon of it is that it's not a good thing, although I'm sure one of our resident neocons will be in, in a minute to weigh in on how it's the greatest thing since the neutron bomb.

[Canyarion]

Originally Posted by Stonecutter

... I don't think you can accurately predict...

That's the problem with most of these technologies isn't it? You don't know what the effects on the long therm are.

Genetic manipulation, cell phone radiation....

[Typhoid]

I got Uranus covered....that baby's mine.

[Happydude]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

I got Uranus covered....that baby's mine.

i could swear that was GMs

[Typhoid]

Hay...i called shotgun on Uranus....ok......its mine, if he wants it he cant because Uranus is mine!!!!

[Hero2]

Wait dident they change the name of that planet to urectum???? :P