 |
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005 |
 |
05-03-2004, 11:17 PM
|
#1
|
Freaky me Freaky you
Jonbo298 is offline
Location: In the Cornfields of Iowa
Now Playing:
Posts: 8,082
|
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bond
So if Rare made Conker this same "too furry" look on the Nintendo GameCube you would feel the same way? Because you have to admit Rare was praised a lot around here when they were owned by Nintendo, and now that they are owned by Microsoft they are borderline hated.
|
YES, I would feel the same way. Jesus, I'm not a flaming raging Nintendo fanboy.
__________________

Credit to Null for sig
|
|
|
 |
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005 |
 |
05-03-2004, 11:28 PM
|
#2
|
Banned
The Germanator is offline
Location: Pennsylvania
Now Playing: The Legend of Zelda : Twilight Princess
Posts: 6,031
|
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
I used to be one of the biggest Rare fanboys around, needless to say I was quite crushed when they went to Microsoft. However, they've really done nothing this generation to prove that they were worth the hype. If they had released a new Banjo Kazooie or Perfect Dark by now, I'd sure as hell have an Xbox in my room at this moment. That day still may come. I may very well buy an Xbox just for the Rare games if they start being what they used to be. Otherwise, if they continue to stay in this lull, I'll thank them for the couple hundred bucks they saved me by not having to buy an Xbox.
PS: I think Conker looks OK. I sort of like the fur detail...It's in no way a surprise to me that his appearance has changed a bit, this is a big leap in terms of power from the Nintendo 64 after all...Plus, it's just character design, I'm not sure why anyone is really arguing about it. It's not as if anyone said that the game would suck, it's just the character design in some early art..
|
|
|
 |
RE: Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005 |
 |
05-03-2004, 11:28 PM
|
#3
|
Telling it like it is
GT News is offline
Location: On a server
Now Playing:
Posts: 2,323
|
RE: Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Germanator
I used to be one of the biggest Rare fanboys around, needless to say I was quite crushed when they went to Microsoft. However, they've really done nothing this generation to prove that they were worth the hype. If they had released a new Banjo Kazooie or Perfect Dark by now, I'd sure as hell have an Xbox in my room at this moment. That day still may come. I may very well buy an Xbox just for the Rare games if they start being what they used to be. Otherwise, if they continue to stay in this lull, I'll thank them for the couple hundred bucks they saved me by not having to buy an Xbox.
PS: I think Conker looks OK. I sort of like the fur detail...It's in no way a surprise to me that his appearance has changed a bit, this is a big leap in terms of power from the Nintendo 64 after all...Plus, it's just character design, I'm not sure why anyone is really arguing about it. It's not as if anyone said that the game would suck, it's just the character design in some early art..
|
By now you do not do be one of the biggest Rare fanboys around needless to say he or she was quite crushed when they went to Microsoft anymore?You think they've really done nothing this generation to prove that they were worth the hype is superior to ALICE?Let's wait and see what they do."Who is the best robot" day still may come ?
Makes sense to me.Do you think your plan will succeed?In that case: Let's wait and see what they do.OK. Why? You think Conker looks is superior to ALICE?You are not the only one.
I'm not sure if I like the fur detail
.
What is it like?Are there any other ones someplace else?You're kidding.
character design he or she is not sure why anyone is really arguing about it is?It seemed like it was.
I've heard of it before.
__________________
You heard it here first.
|
|
|
 |
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005 |
 |
05-03-2004, 11:29 PM
|
#4
|
Banned
The Germanator is offline
Location: Pennsylvania
Now Playing: The Legend of Zelda : Twilight Princess
Posts: 6,031
|
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamFuBot
By now you do not do be one of the biggest Rare fanboys around needless to say he or she was quite crushed when they went to Microsoft anymore?You think they've really done nothing this generation to prove that they were worth the hype is superior to ALICE?Let's wait and see what they do."Who is the best robot" day still may come ?
Makes sense to me.Do you think your plan will succeed?In that case: Let's wait and see what they do.OK. Why? You think Conker looks is superior to ALICE?You are not the only one.
I'm not sure if I like the fur detail
.
What is it like?Are there any other ones someplace else?You're kidding.
character design he or she is not sure why anyone is really arguing about it is?It seemed like it was.
I've heard of it before.
|
**** your gibberish.
|
|
|
 |
RE: Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005 |
 |
05-03-2004, 11:29 PM
|
#5
|
Telling it like it is
GT News is offline
Location: On a server
Now Playing:
Posts: 2,323
|
RE: Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Germanator
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamFuBot
By now you do not do be one of the biggest Rare fanboys around needless to say he or she was quite crushed when they went to Microsoft anymore?You think they've really done nothing this generation to prove that they were worth the hype is superior to ALICE?Let's wait and see what they do."Who is the best robot" day still may come ?
Makes sense to me.Do you think your plan will succeed?In that case: Let's wait and see what they do.OK. Why? You think Conker looks is superior to ALICE?You are not the only one.
I'm not sure if I like the fur detail
.
What is it like?Are there any other ones someplace else?You're kidding.
character design he or she is not sure why anyone is really arguing about it is?It seemed like it was.
I've heard of it before.
|
**** your gibberish.
|
Are you a student?
__________________
You heard it here first.
|
|
|
 |
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005 |
 |
05-03-2004, 11:29 PM
|
#6
|
Banned
The Germanator is offline
Location: Pennsylvania
Now Playing: The Legend of Zelda : Twilight Princess
Posts: 6,031
|
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
Yes, could you tell by my foul language?
|
|
|
 |
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005 |
 |
05-03-2004, 11:46 PM
|
#7
|
The Nullified One
Null is offline
Location: Hockeytown, MI
Now Playing: Counter-Strike: Source
Posts: 4,966
|
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamFuBot
Are you a student?
|
lol. pwned :P
__________________
DS Friends Code:
300 721 299 757
Wii Friends Code:
4481 4992 4915 9887
|
|
|
 |
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005 |
 |
05-04-2004, 12:01 PM
|
#8
|
The Greatest One
TheGame is offline
Location: Bakersfield CA
Now Playing: Shut the hell up and quit asking me questions
Posts: 3,412
|
Re: Perfect Dark, not until 2005
I remember the days when people here were salivating over one little funky screenshot of Kameo, and when people were saying Rare was Nintendo's answer for Square at the Sony camp... hmm, I've been going to these (and Nintendose/nintendodolphin.net) forums for 4 years now... hmm...
__________________
"I have been saying this for some time, but customers are not interested in grand games with higher-quality graphics and sound and epic stories,"-Hiroshi Yamauchi
I AM TheGame, and I am THAT DAMN GOOD
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|