Space Madness Round 1 - Strange Transmission

[Vampyr]

Originally Posted by jeepnut

I don't know about the others, but the reason I'm not voting for Swan is because YOU said we should. You picked him out of thin air and expected the rest of us to jump onboard. Now, your convincing the more gullible ones among us that anyone who doesn't go along with your vote is a loony toon. You have provided no evidence. You've just stated that if we want to prove Swan is innocent, then we should all turn on him.

Yes, I admitted that I picked him out of thin air, just like I picked Uber paddler out of thin air. The only difference is that no one had a problem with Uber Paddler, but for some reason people are hell bent to not vote off Swan.

[jeepnut]

Originally Posted by Vampyr

Yes, I admitted that I picked him out of thin air, just like I picked Uber paddler out of thin air. The only difference is that no one had a problem with Uber Paddler, but for some reason people are hell bent to not vote off Swan.

No one had a problem with Uber because up until just recently, he wasn't even participating. Can't miss someone who doesn't participate. Swan on the other hand is participating and got voted off rather early in the previous game. I wouldn't have any problem voting for him, but it kinda sucks to get voted off in the first round of both games.

[Vampyr]

Originally Posted by jeepnut

No one had a problem with Uber because up until just recently, he wasn't even participating. Can't miss someone who doesn't participate. Swan on the other hand is participating and got voted off rather early in the previous game. I wouldn't have any problem voting for him, but it kinda sucks to get voted off in the first round of both games.

Hrrm, I didn't realize he got voted out first time last time.

But it still doesn't explain why Typh came out so adamantly for him.

Or why Swan was so blatantly crazy early in the thread. :\

[Typhoid]

Originally Posted by Vampyr

Hrrm, I didn't realize he got voted out first time last time.

But it still doesn't explain why Typh came out so adamantly for him.

Or why Swan was so blatantly crazy early in the thread. :\

Did you not read?
Dont try throw my name out there to make it out like I'm trying to protect him.

I even said it has NOTHING to do with who it was. You could have told people to vote for Germy, and I would have done the same thing. If this was reversed, and it was for Uber paddler, it would have been the same.

It wasnt WHO you were getting them to vote for.
It was THE FACT you were getting them to vote for someone.

[Vampyr]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

Did you not read?
Dont try throw my name out there to make it out like I'm trying to protect him.

I even said it has NOTHING to do with who it was. You could have told people to vote for Germy, and I would have done the same thing. If this was reversed, and it was for Uber paddler, it would have been the same.

It wasnt WHO you were getting them to vote for.
It was THE FACT you were getting them to vote for someone.

Yes, but I said to only vote for him for as long as it took to see if anyone would resist the change. At first the majority was focused on Germantor, and no one said anything. Then the majority was focused on Uber, and no one said anything.

Then the majority was on Swan, and suddenly a group of people cared.

When I initially voted for Swan, it was due to him making the huge sized font post, and I said "If the majority moves towards him, and no one really complains, we'll know he's not crazy, but if a group of people fight against it, then that mean's he is crazy."

I was more than willing to vote for someone other than Swan, if you all weren't making it so suspicious that he's part of a group with you. Not only didn't you vote for him, which I could never have really held against you, but you vehemently defended him.

And now that Uber is here, why aren't you shifting your votes to someone else who hasn't participated very much? There are a couple. Instead you're shifting them to me, someone who is very interested in the game and enjoying it. You're being contradictory to your own reasoning on that point.

[Typhoid]

Originally Posted by Vampyr

Yes, but I said to only vote for him for as long as it took to see if anyone would resist the change. At first the majority was focused on Germantor, and no one said anything. Then the majority was focused on Uber, and no one said anything.

Then the majority was on Swan, and suddenly a group of people cared.

When I initially voted for Swan, it was due to him making the huge sized font post, and I said "If the majority moves towards him, and no one really complains, we'll know he's not crazy, but if a group of people fight against it, then that mean's he is crazy."

I was more than willing to vote for someone other than Swan, if you all weren't making it so suspicious that he's part of a group with you. Not only didn't you vote for him, which I could never have really held against you, but you vehemently defended him.

And now that Uber is here, why aren't you shifting your votes to someone else who hasn't participated very much? There are a couple. Instead you're shifting them to me, someone who is very interested in the game and enjoying it. You're being contradictory to your own reasoning on that point.

You're trying to twist it as if we're protecting Swan.
We're not.
You can say "You sound like you're protecting him" or "Seems like you care about him" to all of us as much as you want to win over your followers.

But like you said, you picked him at random.
So we both know, and we all know - it has nothing to do with it being Swan.
But I await your "It sounds like you're backing Swan really fast" post in return to this one.
You don't know if he's a crazy or not.
You just want to randomly kill someone, and want to see who follows you.
We want to stop you from randomly killing anyone.

The reason now, we're not going after people who aren't playing, is because we have a reason to actually vote for someone now.
The reason of an attempt at blatent manipulation.

[Vampyr]

Originally Posted by Typhoid

You're trying to twist it as if we're protecting Swan.
We're not.
You can say "You sound like you're protecting him" or "Seems like you care about him" to all of us as much as you want to win over your followers.

But like you said, you picked him at random.
So we both know, and we all know - it has nothing to do with it being Swan.
But I await your "It sounds like you're backing Swan really fast" post in return to this one.
You don't know if he's a crazy or not.
You just want to randomly kill someone, and want to see who follows you.
We want to stop you from randomly killing anyone.

The reason now, we're not going after people who aren't playing, is because we have a reason to actually vote for someone now.
The reason of an attempt at blatent manipulation.

You sound like you're trying to be manipulative, actually. You're voting for one of the most active people in the game at the moment, a person who I know isn't crazy. It seems odd you would go from voting for the least active person to possibly the most active person, unless that active person is seriously onto whatever you're up to, and endangering your plans.

I'm not being manipulative, all I did was present a plan, one with some logic behind it (or as much logic as is possible under the circumstances). I presented a -reason- for doing it, it was up to everyone else if they wanted to follow this plan or not.

I have not contacted anyone outside of the messages I've posted in this thread, everyone here knows that. I haven't sent conniving PM's trying to sway people to my side, I just presented a plan and let it be.

Now suddenly, when people start following the plan I presented, you and a few others jump all over -me- for being manipulative.

Edit:
@Jeepnut: I actually spoke out against voting Germy off in the post right before yours, when I switched from you to Uber, and you did the same. We had similar reasoning at that point. I would have remained perfectly healthy if I had just remained with the banddwagon, but the sudden shift of votes seemed way to suspicious to me.

[jeepnut]

Originally Posted by Vampyr

Yes, but I said to only vote for him for as long as it took to see if anyone would resist the change. At first the majority was focused on Germantor, and no one said anything. Then the majority was focused on Uber, and no one said anything.

Then the majority was on Swan, and suddenly a group of people cared.

When I initially voted for Swan, it was due to him making the huge sized font post, and I said "If the majority moves towards him, and no one really complains, we'll know he's not crazy, but if a group of people fight against it, then that mean's he is crazy."

I was more than willing to vote for someone other than Swan, if you all weren't making it so suspicious that he's part of a group with you. Not only didn't you vote for him, which I could never have really held against you, but you vehemently defended him.

And now that Uber is here, why aren't you shifting your votes to someone else who hasn't participated very much? There are a couple. Instead you're shifting them to me, someone who is very interested in the game and enjoying it. You're being contradictory to your own reasoning on that point.

Ahem. I believe I spoke out against the vote for Germanator as it didn't have much reasoning. I switched my vote to you because I felt you were trying to deceive us. I'd gladly switch it to someone else who isn't participating, but as far as I can tell, everyone has made their minimum posts.

[Typhoid]

The problem with Uber, is that he wasn't participating. People joined general concensus and started voting for him. Building alliances.

But then he started actually playing, so people were reluctant to change their votes away from him. And it just so happened, there you were - trying to tell people who to vote for, opposed to letting them choose for themselves.

And then you come in saying "No, Vote for Swan", and suddenly have people following you, for no reason at all.

And now, here you are, trying to save yourself with a roundabout way of reasoning, that doesnt explain your actual motive.

[Teuthida]

Not to defend the drug runner, but I do believe that I was the first passenger on this merry ship to vote for Swan. The accusations trust upon Vampyr are uncalled for my good men. Quite illogical to attack him. Illogical to the point of being crazy perhaps? Now where is my tea?