Go Back   GameTavern > House Specials > Happy Hour
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: Official NFL Thread 2009-2010
Old 09-28-2009, 12:32 PM   #1
Professor S
Devourer of Worlds
 
Professor S's Avatar
 
Professor S is offline
Location: Mount Penn, PA
Now Playing: Team Fortress 2, all day everyday
Posts: 6,608
Default Re: Official NFL Thread 2009-2010

I think right now the Eagles have a mess on their hands in the QB position.

You have McNabb hurt but will be back soon.

Kolb is playing very well, especially for an unseasoned youngster.

Vick looks lackluster at best, but by collecting $5 million a year he's burning a hole in the bench.

Lets not forget Garcia, but at least he knows to keep out of the picture as much as possible. If Kolb tanked, the situation would be even worse.

So if McNabb comes back and plays poorly, what then? Honestly, signing Vick is a situation that has zero upside. It still blows my mind that it happened at all.
__________________
  Reply With Quote

Re: Official NFL Thread 2009-2010
Old 09-28-2009, 01:26 PM   #2
TheGame
The Greatest One
 
TheGame's Avatar
 
TheGame is offline
Location: Bakersfield CA
Now Playing: Shut the hell up and quit asking me questions
Posts: 3,412
Default Re: Official NFL Thread 2009-2010

Signing Vick was purely a gamble. Though I don't think they really expected to ever have to rely on him for the team to win games.. But it looks like it may be the situation sometime down the line.
__________________
"I have been saying this for some time, but customers are not interested in grand games with higher-quality graphics and sound and epic stories,"-Hiroshi Yamauchi
I AM TheGame, and I am THAT DAMN GOOD
  Reply With Quote

Re: Official NFL Thread 2009-2010
Old 09-28-2009, 03:56 PM   #3
KillerGremlin
No Pants
 
KillerGremlin's Avatar
 
KillerGremlin is offline
Location: Friggin In The Riggin
Now Playing: my ding-a-ling
Posts: 4,566
Default Re: Official NFL Thread 2009-2010

I don't think signing Vick was a gamble. We can debate if it was a poor decision, but I don't think it was a gamble. I don't think anyone expected Kolb to play as good as he is...if he keeps this up, well damn. And McNabb as good as he is (and I really like McNabb), he has sort of become a liability. I think Philly is considering their options for a future without McNabb. But I'm not from Philly so I don't know the inner workings of that organization. But yeah, signing Vick seemed like an effort to secure a possible Quarterback weapon in case said current Quarterback craps out.

The question is will Vick ever be as good as he was when he played for Atlanta?

On a more serious note, Pittsburgh needs to step things up...1-2 is almost as unacceptable as the Titans going 0-3.
  Reply With Quote

Re: Official NFL Thread 2009-2010
Old 10-05-2009, 10:11 PM   #4
ZebraRampage
1.618
 
ZebraRampage's Avatar
 
ZebraRampage is offline
Location: Pennsylvania
Now Playing: Borderlands 2
Posts: 2,296
Default Re: Official NFL Thread 2009-2010

That wasn't pass interference at the end of the 2nd quarter. The Packers should have had that interception, but I guess the offsides penalty allowed them to replay the down, so I guess it doesn't matter. It's been an interesting game so far.
__________________
Wii Code: 8677-2063-2780-3471
SSBB Code: 3136-7083-6578
Mario Kart Code: 4125-0929-1349
  Reply With Quote

Re: Official NFL Thread 2009-2010
Old 09-28-2009, 06:26 PM   #5
The Germanator
Banned
 
The Germanator's Avatar
 
The Germanator is offline
Location: Pennsylvania
Now Playing: The Legend of Zelda : Twilight Princess
Posts: 6,031
Default Re: Official NFL Thread 2009-2010

Quote:
Originally Posted by Professor S View Post
I think right now the Eagles have a mess on their hands in the QB position.

You have McNabb hurt but will be back soon.

Kolb is playing very well, especially for an unseasoned youngster.

Vick looks lackluster at best, but by collecting $5 million a year he's burning a hole in the bench.

Lets not forget Garcia, but at least he knows to keep out of the picture as much as possible. If Kolb tanked, the situation would be even worse.

So if McNabb comes back and plays poorly, what then? Honestly, signing Vick is a situation that has zero upside. It still blows my mind that it happened at all.
I agree and disagree. If anything the QB position just got way better now that we know Kolb can actually play. Here is the scenario I envision. McNabb steps back in to the starters role after the bye week. I still have confidence in him to finish up with a good year. However, if he falters, the Eagles can now trade him in the off season and get something decent for him while they stick with Kolb who they now have confidence in as the QB of the future.

Also, Vick is only getting $1.6 million this year with a team option for $5.2 million next year. Vick's potential is a bargain for this year. If he doesn't look like he is making progress, then the Eagles don't pick up the option and let him go. I would still rather the Eagles not signed Vick, but if he just makes 2 or 3 big plays in the entire year that lead to some TDs, then for the price tag it was probably worth it. Plus, a big reason he was signed was because of Andy Reid's troubled sons, but that's a whole other story.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern