Go Back   GameTavern > House Specials > Happy Hour
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes

Re: Republican Brown wins Ted Kennedy's Senate Seat
Old 01-22-2010, 10:33 PM   #1
The Germanator
Banned
 
The Germanator's Avatar
 
The Germanator is offline
Location: Pennsylvania
Now Playing: The Legend of Zelda : Twilight Princess
Posts: 6,031
Default Re: Republican Brown wins Ted Kennedy's Senate Seat

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acebot44 View Post
Good hunch.

Check this shit out.
I couldn't believe the Supreme Court did this. This is the most disturbing news out of politics I've experienced in a while. It just doesn't seem right.
  Reply With Quote

Re: Republican Brown wins Ted Kennedy's Senate Seat
Old 01-23-2010, 10:40 AM   #2
Professor S
Devourer of Worlds
 
Professor S's Avatar
 
Professor S is offline
Location: Mount Penn, PA
Now Playing: Team Fortress 2, all day everyday
Posts: 6,608
Default Re: Republican Brown wins Ted Kennedy's Senate Seat

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Germanator View Post
I couldn't believe the Supreme Court did this. This is the most disturbing news out of politics I've experienced in a while. It just doesn't seem right.
Honestly, corporate entities and other special interest groups regardless of political alignment never stopped financing campaigns. The McCain/Feingold legislation only required that they set up subsidiary organizations to then funnel funds to candidates and "non-affiliated" ad campaigns. George Soros has been doing this for years.

All this ruling does is put it out in the open so you know whose money is going where, instead of the money coming from "Concerned Citizens for _________."

EDIT: Here is little more of the court's ruling, without Huffington's decidedly biased quoting:

Quote:
“There is no basis for the proposition that, in the political speech context, the government may impose restrictions on certain disfavored speakers,” he wrote. “The government may regulate corporate speech through disclaimer and disclosure requirements, but it may not suppress that speech altogether.”
So in the end, corporations/unions/organizations and other special interests may be required to add disclosure to their speech regarding campaign finance, but it is unconstitutional to prohibit that speech (1st Amendment). If you actually believe in the Constitution (Justice Steven's never really has), there isn't any basis to keep large orgs from financing and campaigning for candidates.
__________________

Last edited by Professor S : 01-23-2010 at 10:53 AM.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:41 PM.


vBulletin skin developed by: eXtremepixels
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
GameTavern