Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows

KillerGremlin · 07-07-2011, 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BreakABone

She grew, my penis grew, we had a good time!

The first part of this movie was boring. My friend stated that it followed the book (with all the traveling and stuff). I still haven't picked up the last two books. I should...because the books are much better than the films.

My question is....was the two-parts really necessary, or could they have fit this into a neatly edited, awesome 3-hour movie?

Professor S · 07-07-2011, 10:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KillerGremlin

My question is....was the two-parts really necessary, or could they have fit this into a neatly edited, awesome 3-hour movie?

The first part of Deathly Hollows was the only Potter movie I truly disliked. We already knew the characters and also knew the danger they were in. All the important plot points could have been addressed in 30 minutes. And we would have been saved this awkward moment: