Yo Null, more questions for you ¦¬Þ

Null · 09-24-2003, 04:59 PM

processor usually controls how well the game would run.

you can run a new game on a fast CPU with a old old geforce 1 card and it would run fast look ugly.

thing with the nv30 chips was that the cards were louder.

Jason1 · 09-24-2003, 07:43 PM

I downloaded that FFXI benchmark thing just for kicks(I doubt I'll be getting the game) Anyways, I got 5255 on my Radeon 9500pro. Im running at 2.67ghz. I guess thats pretty good...it satisfies me at least.

Crono · 09-24-2003, 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason1

I downloaded that FFXI benchmark thing just for kicks(I doubt I'll be getting the game) Anyways, I got 5255 on my Radeon 9500pro. Im running at 2.67ghz. I guess thats pretty good...it satisfies me at least.

You guess that's pretty good? 5255 is an outstanding score. Anything above 2000 can run FFXI smoothly. Also, when the game comes out for PC at the end of October, the clan will be taking in game screens (because you can), and we'll show it to GT. You'll want it then.

ominub · 09-24-2003, 07:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Crono

You guess that's pretty good? 5255 is an outstanding score. Anything above 2000 can run FFXI smoothly. Also, when the game comes out for PC at the end of October, the clan will be taking in game screens (because you can), and we'll show it to GT. You'll want it then.

well really
0-1500 means your pc is crap dont get the game
1500-3000 you can run the game on low settings
3000-4000 can run the game medium to high settings with little lag
4000+ you can run the game at max setting with no lag at all

jason you got like the same score as me mine was also it the 5200 not sure the exact numbers but just a little above 5200

Jonbo298 · 09-24-2003, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason1

I downloaded that FFXI benchmark thing just for kicks(I doubt I'll be getting the game) Anyways, I got 5255 on my Radeon 9500pro. Im running at 2.67ghz. I guess thats pretty good...it satisfies me at least.

You and ominub are getting the same score but yet your computer is better then ominub's. Here is a comparison

Jason1
P4 2.66ghz
512Mb's DDRAM
80Gig HD
Saphire ATI Radeon 9500PRO

ominub
AMD 2500+XP Barton
768 Megs DDR PC2700 ram
40Gig HD
Geforce FX 5200

Now I can only think of one reason why you (Jason) might be getting a score that should be higher for what you have. You probably have not so good ram. Like PC-2100 ram from a generic company. But I could be wrong. And maybe something else caused it.....

Jason1 · 09-24-2003, 10:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jonbo298

You and ominub are getting the same score but yet your computer is better then ominub's. Here is a comparison

Jason1
P4 2.66ghz
512Mb's DDRAM
80Gig HD
Saphire ATI Radeon 9500PRO

ominub
AMD 2500+XP Barton
768 Megs DDR PC2700 ram
40Gig HD
Geforce FX 5200

Now I can only think of one reason why you (Jason) might be getting a score that should be higher for what you have. You probably have not so good ram. Like PC-2100 ram from a generic company. But I could be wrong. And maybe something else caused it.....

How exactly is my system any better than ominub's? He has more RAM, and a better Graphics Card. Mine might be a little faster mhz wise, but he has me beat on everything else(HD size means nothing in this discussion.) And as for my RAM: [DDR400] 512MB PC3200 Memory.

Jonbo298 · 09-25-2003, 03:02 PM

The HD thing was there just because you had it and I didn't feel like cutting it out because I was lazy. But still, your score should've been a little higher. The only other thing I can think of for you getting a 5200 is that you were running other programs in the background when you did the benchmark. But I still could be wrong. But I'll just stop thinking and move on