Time Magazine's Person of The Year:

[Professor S]

I actually think that whoever won this election would have won this dubious honor, considering how charged it was and the worldwide ramifications of it.

I say dubious because the Man of the Year award is not just awarded to those considered to have a necessarily "good" affect, just those that have had a resounding one. (That should appease you dastardly liberals out there )

[The Germanator]

Originally Posted by The Strangler

I say dubious because the Man of the Year award is not just awarded to those considered to have a necessarily "good" affect, just those that have had a resounding one. (That should appease you dastardly liberals out there )

It's true. Hitler won man of the year from Time a while back, so it isn't always a good man.

*never made a Bush/Hitler comparison here, just saying.